<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Framing the Dialogue</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.framingthedialogue.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.framingthedialogue.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 23:14:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rule 13 by Life Unlock / Framing the Dialogue</title>
		<link>http://www.framingthedialogue.com/archives/rule-13/#comment-37680</link>
		<dc:creator>Life Unlock / Framing the Dialogue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 23:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.framingthedialogue.com/?p=1783#comment-37680</guid>
		<description>[...] political attack against an opponent smells of Saul Alinsky tactics which has become the left’s preferred weapon against the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] political attack against an opponent smells of Saul Alinsky tactics which has become the left’s preferred weapon against the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My 10,000 Steps by Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.framingthedialogue.com/archives/my-10000-steps/#comment-36927</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 00:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.framingthedialogue.com/?p=9111#comment-36927</guid>
		<description>Or you could bring her out more often!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or you could bring her out more often!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My 10,000 Steps by Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.framingthedialogue.com/archives/my-10000-steps/#comment-36803</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 14:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.framingthedialogue.com/?p=9111#comment-36803</guid>
		<description>Or you could get your own furry little motivator :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or you could get your own furry little motivator <img src='http://www.framingthedialogue.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thinkpol (think &#8211; poll) by Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.framingthedialogue.com/archives/thinkpol-think-poll/#comment-35952</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 20:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.framingthedialogue.com/?p=2233#comment-35952</guid>
		<description>My take from 1984 is that even with severe control over speech Big Brother could not control thoughts.  I equate the way authorities try to control &quot;thought&quot; by controlling speech.  These authorities are essentially thought police in that they control expressed thoughts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My take from 1984 is that even with severe control over speech Big Brother could not control thoughts.  I equate the way authorities try to control &#8220;thought&#8221; by controlling speech.  These authorities are essentially thought police in that they control expressed thoughts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thinkpol (think &#8211; poll) by LeDerp02196</title>
		<link>http://www.framingthedialogue.com/archives/thinkpol-think-poll/#comment-35899</link>
		<dc:creator>LeDerp02196</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 04:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.framingthedialogue.com/?p=2233#comment-35899</guid>
		<description>how does any of this relate to thought police? these laws are certainly ridiculous, but i don&#039;t see any connection to controlling your very mind and thoughts. Am I missing something obvious or what?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how does any of this relate to thought police? these laws are certainly ridiculous, but i don&#8217;t see any connection to controlling your very mind and thoughts. Am I missing something obvious or what?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Incomplete Far Side by Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.framingthedialogue.com/archives/the-incomplete-far-side/#comment-35639</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 12:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.framingthedialogue.com/?p=8524#comment-35639</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Incomplete Far Side by Annette</title>
		<link>http://www.framingthedialogue.com/archives/the-incomplete-far-side/#comment-35557</link>
		<dc:creator>Annette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 04:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.framingthedialogue.com/?p=8524#comment-35557</guid>
		<description>As a former fan of the Far Side, I must now admit that I am quite disappointed with Gary Larson.  His cartoons have made many of us believe that he is an intelligent man with a sense of humor, and through the years, in a seriousness, hasn&#039;t the man made quite a bundle of money at our expense?  

Let me be clear here.  I do not think that in any way that a book review actually endorsing and giving Larson&#039;s work a favorable review in any way disrespects his work or should cause him any emotional distress.  When books are reviewed, authors and photographers are usually pleased to have their work favorably reviewed and also have photographs, illustrations and quotes included within the reviews.  For an cartoonist and publisher to object to a positive review with samples of the work is just ridiculous.  This is a digital age, and Larson had better come to grips that his work is going to be put out there digitally in cyberspace whether he and his publishers like it or not.  He can&#039;t have it both ways.

Let&#039;s be honest here, before the &quot;Complete Far Side&quot; was published, how many times did he and his publishers prostitute his &quot;children&quot; for sale in various re-packages and books that included the same cartoons?  Yes, Mr. Larson, it&#039;s OK if you exploit your &quot;children,&quot; it&#039;s just not alright if you don&#039;t have control of the media and profit from it, is that the problem?  

Anytime something is put out there in the public forum in print or photographic form, it will be subject to use by other parties.  I am a photographer, and although I have provided my work for free to people and have requested only a photo credit, very rarely have I been accorded that professional courtesy, despite my work helping various non-profit groups, private businesses and individuals.  

People are still using my work to help themselves, their causes, and their professional images digitally on the internet and in other media forms, but there is nothing I can do to prevent it.  I could write intimidating letters as Mr. Larson&#039;s publishers do or sound like a whiny jerk as Larson does, but that would only hurt my reputation which I work hard to maintain.  I do what practical people do in these situations.  I may complain, but I have to realize that I have no control over the world wide internet and move on.  Mr. Larson, enjoy your money and move on.  You don&#039;t control the world.  Deal with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a former fan of the Far Side, I must now admit that I am quite disappointed with Gary Larson.  His cartoons have made many of us believe that he is an intelligent man with a sense of humor, and through the years, in a seriousness, hasn&#8217;t the man made quite a bundle of money at our expense?  </p>
<p>Let me be clear here.  I do not think that in any way that a book review actually endorsing and giving Larson&#8217;s work a favorable review in any way disrespects his work or should cause him any emotional distress.  When books are reviewed, authors and photographers are usually pleased to have their work favorably reviewed and also have photographs, illustrations and quotes included within the reviews.  For an cartoonist and publisher to object to a positive review with samples of the work is just ridiculous.  This is a digital age, and Larson had better come to grips that his work is going to be put out there digitally in cyberspace whether he and his publishers like it or not.  He can&#8217;t have it both ways.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s be honest here, before the &#8220;Complete Far Side&#8221; was published, how many times did he and his publishers prostitute his &#8220;children&#8221; for sale in various re-packages and books that included the same cartoons?  Yes, Mr. Larson, it&#8217;s OK if you exploit your &#8220;children,&#8221; it&#8217;s just not alright if you don&#8217;t have control of the media and profit from it, is that the problem?  </p>
<p>Anytime something is put out there in the public forum in print or photographic form, it will be subject to use by other parties.  I am a photographer, and although I have provided my work for free to people and have requested only a photo credit, very rarely have I been accorded that professional courtesy, despite my work helping various non-profit groups, private businesses and individuals.  </p>
<p>People are still using my work to help themselves, their causes, and their professional images digitally on the internet and in other media forms, but there is nothing I can do to prevent it.  I could write intimidating letters as Mr. Larson&#8217;s publishers do or sound like a whiny jerk as Larson does, but that would only hurt my reputation which I work hard to maintain.  I do what practical people do in these situations.  I may complain, but I have to realize that I have no control over the world wide internet and move on.  Mr. Larson, enjoy your money and move on.  You don&#8217;t control the world.  Deal with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Forgotten Man by In The Year 2525 / Framing the Dialogue</title>
		<link>http://www.framingthedialogue.com/archives/the-forgotten-man/#comment-34500</link>
		<dc:creator>In The Year 2525 / Framing the Dialogue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 02:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.framingthedialogue.com/?p=1124#comment-34500</guid>
		<description>[...] accounts of the Great Depression give FDR credit for ending it.  There have been books like The Forgotten Man which set the record straight, but few probably read this.  However nearly seventy years after the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] accounts of the Great Depression give FDR credit for ending it.  There have been books like The Forgotten Man which set the record straight, but few probably read this.  However nearly seventy years after the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Outliers by Lincoln On Leadership / Framing the Dialogue</title>
		<link>http://www.framingthedialogue.com/archives/outliers/#comment-33808</link>
		<dc:creator>Lincoln On Leadership / Framing the Dialogue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 20:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.framingthedialogue.com/?p=259#comment-33808</guid>
		<description>[...] opportunity to practice his craft which became a big part of his leadership style.  This fits with Malcolm Gladwell&#8217;s theory in his book Outliers about 10,000 hours being a tipping point for attaining skill in any task.  I cannot say that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] opportunity to practice his craft which became a big part of his leadership style.  This fits with Malcolm Gladwell&#8217;s theory in his book Outliers about 10,000 hours being a tipping point for attaining skill in any task.  I cannot say that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Complete Far Side by Michelle</title>
		<link>http://www.framingthedialogue.com/archives/the-complete-far-side/#comment-31186</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 08:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.framingthedialogue.com/?p=315#comment-31186</guid>
		<description>I think Gary Larson is just messing with everybody who reads the comic. i would if i were in his shoes, it would make me laugh every time i think about it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Gary Larson is just messing with everybody who reads the comic. i would if i were in his shoes, it would make me laugh every time i think about it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

