Framing the Dialogue

Update Earth Day Plus 40

I received a comment regarding the “yahoo” sources that argue that take an alternative view that Rachel Carson may not have been as much of a savior as promoted by the press.  The blue highlighted sections of any of my posts are links to articles that provide additional reading on the subject.  Since the commenter thought that my sources were yahoos I decided to add a few more.  I did exhaustive research by searching the terms “DDT malaria.”  I actually used Yahoo for my search and here are a few more sources:

“I understand the environmental arguments, but sometimes they cry so much fear, their arguments become inhuman to the people. It’s almost like they want the people to perish for the animals. No chemical has no side effects. But let us first reduce infant mortality. That is the environment I care about right now.’’

“Uganda, a nation of 30 million people, had an estimated 10.6 million cases of malaria in 2006, according to the World Health Organization, with 70,000 to 110,000 deaths a year, according to government and university researchers.”

I am not advocating DDT use to the extent that it was in the past. I just don’t understand how some environmentalists stand on their soapboxes and preach about banning DDT and then go home to a comfortable environment while a country that has a hundred thousand deaths from malaria cannot use it to save themselves.

Who are we to decide what is best for someone else? 

To quote a famous politician, “that is above my pay grade.”

You can read the original post here.

Leave a comment

Use basic HTML (<a href="">, <strong>, <blockquote>)